Our logo

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Obama

Bookworm
post Sep 30 2009, 03:54 PM
Post #1


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male



Are people being too critical or not critical enough about Obama? I know I posted a joke in the world's longest thread, but it seems some people's opposition to him goes way past joking. And other people's adoration of him almost reaches the point of worship.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=15122


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FloodG8-9595
post Sep 30 2009, 04:18 PM
Post #2


Captain Jack
***

Group: Members
Posts: 709
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Austin Tx
Member No.: 50
Gender: Male



Agreed.. I try to keep a open mind on the President.. I don't think he's trying to kill old people and I don't think he's Hitler.

On the other hand... I also don't think he's Jesus or even a great president... so far.. he gets a resounding "I'm not dead" vote from me.
see my rating scale below

From Best to Worst

We Elected God (literally)
This guy isn't half bad
well I thought i liked this guy
I'm not dead
Hey we're dying out here
Save us
We elected Satan (literally)

This post has been edited by FloodG8-9595: Sep 30 2009, 04:19 PM


--------------------
user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bookworm
post Sep 30 2009, 05:18 PM
Post #3


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male



I think that a lot of people had high expectations of him, and there was no way he could actually live up to those expectations. And he was willingly going along with those high expectations on the campaign trail. He promised to quickly end the was in Iraq, and people had expectations that he would do so, yet when he got into office, he acknowledged that the withdrawal would not be as quick as he originally made it sound. I wonder if he just figured that out when he became president, or if he was just unwilling to acknowledge it before the election.


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FloodG8-9595
post Sep 30 2009, 05:28 PM
Post #4


Captain Jack
***

Group: Members
Posts: 709
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Austin Tx
Member No.: 50
Gender: Male



Anyone with half a brain has to know that things aren't as simple as we'd like them to be. Making that promise helped get him elected.. he HAD to have known that he couldn't just say.. "okay shut the war down now"

He fed into peoples expectations and now has the face the reality of those expectations not being reasonable... and hopefully do the best he can.

I was never in the "he can do no wrong" camp.. after all, what are the odds of getting a real GOOD president after 40something pretty bad ones. I'm starting to think that the job just isn't cut out for good people.


--------------------
user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bookworm
post Sep 30 2009, 06:26 PM
Post #5


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male



QUOTE(FloodG8-9595 @ Sep 30 2009, 04:28 PM)
after all, what are the odds of getting a real GOOD president after 40something pretty bad ones.
*


My my. You are casting a pretty wide net with that "pretty bad" description. Do you actually think that we haven't had any good presidents?


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FloodG8-9595
post Oct 1 2009, 10:59 AM
Post #6


Captain Jack
***

Group: Members
Posts: 709
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Austin Tx
Member No.: 50
Gender: Male



In my estimation it takes a WHOLE lot to be a good president. but, you are right... I really shouldn't say that all of them were pretty bad. but, who in the recent past has really wowed you?
It's hard to be a good president forever... even if you were a good one for your era..

I should say that there are presidents that I like more than others but, the one thing that always keeps me from being a presidential cheerleader is that... their all politicians and gernerally I think people who make that their life these days are only interseted in helping themselves.

Sorry if this is a jumbled mess.. I had to type quickly so I can go pick up that Chicken i mentioned in another thread.


--------------------
user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
manadren
post Oct 1 2009, 08:51 PM
Post #7


Dapper Swindler
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3 654
Joined: 24-June 04
Member No.: 12
Gender: Male



I'd have to say that so far, Obama is the best president we've had since I've been old enough to care. That said, I lean to the left, so that pretty much means I like him a little better than Clinton. But back to the original question, Obama seems to be an almost mindbogglingly polarizing president, and the media and it's "show the controversy" (even when it's not there) mentality hasn't exactly been helping things. It seems to be winding down a little bit everywhere except fox news, but not much. Oh how I long for the day when the media decides to start reporting facts instead of the opinions of a few radicals on either side. Ok, so maybe I'm exaggerating a little on that last bit, but I digress.

News media in general is getting lazy. The problem of course being that it's being handled like any other business, cut costs and increase market share by any means possible. This with traditional media waning as online offerings gain traction makes things even worse. And the online offerings boil down to rumors, AP copypasta, and blogs which are pure opinion. Real reporting is on the decline, in favor of anything that an grab an eyeball or two for 30 seconds.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Red Squirrel
post Oct 1 2009, 09:10 PM
Post #8


Merry Christmas!
*****

Group: Admin
Posts: 7 848
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Ontario Canada
Member No.: 4
Gender: Male



I don't follow politics that much but yeah, he seems to be good from what I hear. There's of course, "obama haters" but I find most of them just hate him, but don't really have a good reason to. "because he's black" does not count. tongue.gif


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bookworm
post Oct 1 2009, 10:21 PM
Post #9


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male



QUOTE(manadren @ Oct 1 2009, 07:51 PM)
News media in general is getting lazy. The problem of course being that it's being handled like any other business, cut costs and increase market share by any means possible. This with traditional media waning as online offerings gain traction makes things even worse. And the online offerings boil down to rumors, AP copypasta, and blogs which are pure opinion. Real reporting is on the decline, in favor of anything that an grab an eyeball or two for 30 seconds.
*


I wonder if part of the problem with media is the nature of technology itself. Images and video can be spread around the world before the media has a chance to provide accurate context surrounding those images. Anybody at all can start providing opinions about an image, and have those opinions be read and passed along by hundreds of people. A lot of people though, don't bother reading corrections to previous opinions, if such corrections are even presented. Those people are just interested in looking at the images or video and drawing whatever conclusions they feel like, no matter what the truth may be. Take those recent ACORN videos for instance. They certainly made the organization look bad, but are those videos an accurate reflection of the entire ACORN organization? I'm not so sure. Then people bring up Obama's association with ACORN in an attempt to make Obama look bad.


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
manadren
post Oct 2 2009, 01:18 AM
Post #10


Dapper Swindler
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3 654
Joined: 24-June 04
Member No.: 12
Gender: Male



I can see what you're saying about the technology issue. In fact I was going to bring it up in my last post, but I was already firmly in rant territory and didn't want to drag it out. It's not a new things though. It started with the 24 hour news networks, which on the one hand spawned an urgency to get a story out as soon as possible, and on the other gave a boost to fluff, celebrity, and other stories which wouldn't have gotten coverage if these networks didn't have 24 hours to fill. The immediacy of the internet further hurts things, where people can find out about major happenings within minutes of their occurrence. With quick, though inaccurate, information readily available, I imagine that there is a sense of urgency in the media, not only to beat their competitors, but also to grab a hold of a story before it gets too cold. There's so much of a push to grab snippets of information and move on to the next things, with no one really ever having a chance to digest any of it.

As for the ACORN thing, that kinda pissed me off. Accusations are made, and a single video surfaces from some anti-ACORN conservative group, and congress kills funding for the entire organization, period. Couldn't they have put funding on hold until an independent investigation was conducted? Or are we switching to guilty at accusation? It could've been just the one woman, or the one office at fault. We don't know, and we very well may never know, because apparently all it takes to convince congress, a democratically controlled congress, is to throw out a few allegations and yell really loud.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chyse
post Oct 2 2009, 11:25 AM
Post #11


Where's my Fatman?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1 651
Joined: 24-June 04
Member No.: 11
Gender: Male



He has a "He's not Bush" vote from me.


--------------------
"Your neighbor was kind enough to let us rip him off and burn his furniture for no reason."-ATHF
"He said no, Err. With his foot." -ATHF
"Please, stop fueling my silent rage." -ATHF
user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bookworm
post Oct 2 2009, 10:10 PM
Post #12


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male



And now Obama's reputation is going to be marred by his failure to convince the Olympic committee to chose Chicago for the 2016 Olympics. After all, Obama must have done something wrong for them to reject Chicago.


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Vogel
post Oct 2 2009, 10:24 PM
Post #13


Most glorious member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1 911
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Lawrenceburg, Tennessee, United States
Member No.: 2
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Bookworm @ Oct 2 2009, 10:10 PM)
And now Obama's reputation is going to be marred by his failure to convince the Olympic committee to chose Chicago for the 2016 Olympics. After all, Obama must have done something wrong for them to reject Chicago.
*


Maybe I just live under a rock, but I don’t think Americans care about the Olympics. (I know I sure don’t.)


--------------------
E-mail, XMPP: chris@chrisvogel.name (OpenPGP)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Red Squirrel
post Oct 3 2009, 06:57 PM
Post #14


Merry Christmas!
*****

Group: Admin
Posts: 7 848
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Ontario Canada
Member No.: 4
Gender: Male



Speaking of the Olympics, they're this year, in CANADA! greengrin.gif I probably wont go, it's all the way at the other end. tongue.gif I'm not that much into it anyway, but it is kinda cool that it's in Canada this year.


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chyse
post Oct 5 2009, 11:07 AM
Post #15


Where's my Fatman?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1 651
Joined: 24-June 04
Member No.: 11
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Bookworm @ Oct 3 2009, 03:10 AM)
And now Obama's reputation is going to be marred by his failure to convince the Olympic committee to chose Chicago for the 2016 Olympics. After all, Obama must have done something wrong for them to reject Chicago.
*


I think Chicago is the reason they rejected Chicago...


--------------------
"Your neighbor was kind enough to let us rip him off and burn his furniture for no reason."-ATHF
"He said no, Err. With his foot." -ATHF
"Please, stop fueling my silent rage." -ATHF
user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FloodG8-9595
post Oct 7 2009, 11:01 AM
Post #16


Captain Jack
***

Group: Members
Posts: 709
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Austin Tx
Member No.: 50
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Chyse @ Oct 5 2009, 11:07 AM)
QUOTE(Bookworm @ Oct 3 2009, 03:10 AM)
And now Obama's reputation is going to be marred by his failure to convince the Olympic committee to chose Chicago for the 2016 Olympics. After all, Obama must have done something wrong for them to reject Chicago.
*


I think Chicago is the reason they rejected Chicago...
*



Ha... too true.

as an american.... I can say that while It's always great to have world events held in our country... I don't really watch the olympics.. I care.. but, I don't care enough... smile.gif

Obama is a decent guy and overall (leaving out my hatred for politians) I think he's a fair president so far. I'm lukewarm but, happy that we've gotten out of the conservative crap house we've been in for a while. It just doesn't seem that Obama has enough supporters with spines to get anything done half the time.

I'm a libritarian mostley but, a left leaning libritarian... I think that some things the government should handle (I won't list them because I don't feel like it) but other than that I just want to be left alone to do what I want.


--------------------
user posted image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bookworm
post Oct 9 2009, 10:53 PM
Post #17


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male



So now Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize. Even he admits that he doesan't deserve it. I guess they give out the prize now simply for good intentions.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/...1929395,00.html


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
manadren
post Oct 10 2009, 03:31 AM
Post #18


Dapper Swindler
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3 654
Joined: 24-June 04
Member No.: 12
Gender: Male



It doesn't seem like he did anything to deserve it really, but he did a lot for international relations simply by being an American president and not being a dick. After Bush, anyone even vaguely personable would fit the bill really.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Stasi
post Oct 10 2009, 06:50 AM
Post #19


I like it spooky
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 603
Joined: 25-June 04
From: Nilbog
Member No.: 20
Gender: Male



Awarding "good intentions", or someone's potential is liable to backfire. One thing that it does accomplish is trivializing the award for future recipients.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bookworm
post Oct 14 2009, 07:59 PM
Post #20


Postaholic
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2 833
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 94
Gender: Male





--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: